tucg

bfawuFBU Logo JPEGnapo logo2nujNEUlogo

pcspoaRMTucuurtu

Maritime union RMT will be taking the demands for a fair deal for British workers on Government Brexit ferry contracts direct to Transport Secretary Chris Grayling on Friday morning.

RMT will be holding a protest outside the DfT at 10am on Friday 11th January (Department for Transport, Great Minster House, 33 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 4DR) setting out the following three core demands on the Government contracts:

1.     All ferries to be fully crewed up with UK ratings‎

2.     Recognition of UK trade unions

3.     UK employment laws to be fully complied with

The RMT protest comes after a slew of publicity around the Seaborne Freight contract awarded at public expense by Chris Grayling and the ongoing dredging of Ramsgate Harbour.

RMT General Secretary, Mick Cash said:

“There has been a barrage of publicity around the Government’s Brexit ferry contracts, and the union has written to both Chris Grayling, who is in control of the arrangements, and the companies involved demanding basic assurances on UK ratings jobs, union recognition and full compliance with UK employment laws.

“RMT has no intention of allowing any backsliding or any stitch-ups of UK seafarers, and that is why we are making our position public with the protest at the Department for Transport on Friday morning. We will not allow the scandal of the Ships of Shame in British waters, where poverty pay below the minimum wage and shocking working conditions are endemic, to roll over to these contracts.

“Under RMT’s SOS2020 campaign banner, we have been fighting for a fair deal and increased employment opportunities across the UK maritime sector. We will taking that message direct to Chris Grayling in the wake of his Brexit contracts on Friday. We expect him, and the companies he has contracted, to meet our demands in full as a matter of urgency.”

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has won a landmark ruling in its dispute with the government over changes made to firefighters’ pensions in 2015. The long and bitter industrial dispute, which included strike action, means that firefighters on the new scheme will have to be put back on the previous pension scheme.

The firefighters’ pension scheme was substantially worsened in 2015, and the FBU argued that the protection imposed on younger members was unlawful on age discrimination grounds. The 2015 changes meant that older members could stay in the existing and better pension scheme, while younger members had to transfer to a new and worse scheme, causing huge financial losses. The FBU initiated over 6,000 Employment Tribunal claims alleging that the changes amounted to unlawful age discrimination.

Under the new scheme, firefighters would not be able to retire before reaching the age of 60. A review commissioned by the coalition government agreed, that in the best case, 23% of current firefighters won’t be able to maintain the required level of fitness until 60, while in the worst case, 92% will not be able to do so. If members chose to retire early, at the former pension age of 55, firefighters in England would see their pension reduced by 21.8%.

Matt Wrack, general secretary, said:

“We are delighted that we have won and our arguments have been vindicated by the Court of Appeal. This result is thanks to the resilience and fortitude of our members – it’s a great Christmas present to thousands of firefighters.

“The attacks were a disgraceful robbery from hardworking firefighters. The Tory/Lib Dem government took no notice of the detailed evidence we provided about the specific nature of firefighters’ work.

“An occupational pension should be based on the realities of that occupation. The government ignored this. They then introduced transitional protection arrangements which were not agreed with firefighters. We have fought a long and arduous legal battle to show that these transitional arrangements were unfair and discriminatory.

“The government has wasted taxpayers’ money on this legal case. The government must now take swift and tangible action to address this unlawful policy.”

Following an overwhelming YES vote for action by RMT Bakerloo South Group members over the company’s failure to ensure sufficient shift coverage in line with previous commitments given, the union has confirmed a programme of industrial action, warning that LU’s current position creates undue stress on staff and puts all members and the travelling public at increased risk.

RMT’s National Executive Committee has now considered this matter and taken the decision to instruct all CSA, CSS and CSM members in Charing Cross, Elephant & Castle, Oxford Circus and Piccadilly Circus Areas to take strike action by not booking on for any shifts that commence between:

• 05:00 hours and 23:01 hours on Wednesday 26th December 2018

• 22:29 hours on Sunday 13th January and 22:29 hours on Monday 14th January 2019

Members will also take industrial action by refusing to familiarise staff who would not normally work at their station, including ambassadors, from 23:02 hours on Wednesday 26th December 2018 until further notice.

RMT General Secretary Mick Cash said:

“RMT members are rightly angry that staffing levels on the Bakerloo Line have been hacked back to the bone, presenting a serious danger to staff and passengers alike.

“Previous commitments to ensure safe staffing coverage have been flouted and in order to press the company to address the issues we have no option but to announce a programme of action.

“The union remains available for serious and genuine talks.”

THE FIREFIGHTERS' DILEMMA

TUCG: MARK SERWOTKA ON THE FIGHT AGAINST AUSTERITY

cool it-218px

 

 

Trade Union news

livemarks   BFAWU  livemarks  PCS  livemarks   FBU 

livemarks  POA   livemarks  NAPO  livemarks    RMT 

livemarks  NUJ   livemarks   NUT   livemarks  URTU

Search the site

BOOK: COST OF LIVING CRISIS

TheCostofLivingCrisis-jpeg 1

By MIchael Calderbank

Foreword by Mark Serwotka, PCS General Secretary

 

Buy now from www.radicalread.co.uk

Based on research commissioned by the TUCG, the book examines why costs have risen for all items of expenditure, ranging from housing and child care to food and transport. He makes practical proposals on how these costs can be reduced. He also delivers an uncompromising message to the leaders of all mainstream Westminster Parties: it is time to end the politics of austerity, an ideological project to cut the size of the state permanently.